Investment Roundup

31 October 2023

“The ‘higher for longer’ narrative now likely the base-case scenario”


In the upcoming FOMC meeting on 2ndNov 2023, it is widely expected that the FED will continue to hold current rates at 5.25-5.50%. The markets have mostly priced in that the FED rates have peaked at current levels, with a ~30% chance of one last hike. However, in the scenario that the FED continues with an additional hike to 6%, the markets has not priced that in, and we would likely experience even higher volatility.

Figure 1: CME Fedwatch Futures Table

Comparing the rates futures and analysts’ forecasts, we are now seemingly inline vs 1 quarter ago when many analysts were “over-optimistic” regarding peak rates and the anticipation of earlier of rate cuts. We now have some consensus that the rate cuts will only begin in 2Q24.

Figure 2: Analysts Forecast (FED Funds Rate upper bound)

However, looking towards the mid-term, we also see in figure 3 that the rate cut cycle is not expected to be as aggressive as first thought. Rates are expected to remain well above 3% in the next 24months, above the FED’s long-term target of 2.5%. The “higher for longer” narrative has now been accepted as the base-case scenario.

Figure 3: Fed Funds Rate and ECB Depo Rate

Another key data point that we have been observing is the 10-2yr yield curve spread. As we have discussed before, the curve is still inverted (short term yield is still above long-term yield) but it seems to on the trend towards normalising. We were at -100bps in June 2023 vs -15bps currently. This could signal a positive development for the longer-term US economy as short-term interest rates fall below longer-term rates, a reflection of expectations that the US economy will revert to a normal economic cycle and continue to expand steadily.

Figure 4: 10yr-2yr Yield Curve Spread

To add on further, we have also seen a fundamental change in the yield curve over the past 6months. The Yield curve has been flattening vs 1 month and 6 months ago – longer duration yields are rising faster than shorter duration, also known as “bear steepening”. Overall, we are seeing a “flattish” yield curve across maturities. This implies that investors’ expectations have shifted to indicate that they are indifferent holding a shorter-term bond vs a longer-term bond – a signal that the markets are anticipating the end of rate hikes but is also not expecting rate cuts any time soon, further adding to the “higher for longer” narrative.

Figure 5: Yield curve over different durations

Now, let uslook at how asset classes historically react to yield curve normalization. Equities tend to fare relatively poorly on the initial onset. This may seem counterintuitive as falling rates is typical a bullish signal for equities, however the real determining factor is a sharp drop in corporate earnings – if a recession indeed occurs. Consumer demand weakens, firms lose pricing power and revenue shrinks further. Fixed income on the other hand tends to do relatively well in this environment, and in the current “bear steepening” stage, investors will tend to benefit from holding shorter-dated vs longer dated bonds.

Figure 6: Historical asset class performance after yield curve nomalisation

In figure 7, reported SPX earnings-per-share has been muted over the quarters with divergence amongst certain sectors growth and decline thus making sector picks even more crucial during this time.

Figure 7: S&P 500 earnings-per-share

Despite the US still seeing ~70% of companies reporting earnings above estimates, this is below both 5-yr average of 77% and 10-yr average of 74%. Further, Q4 guidance has also been lacklustre, with ~55% of companies issuing a negative EPS guidance vs expectation – which further add on to the market retracement. However, such a moderation of forward guidance can be helpful in re-managing investors/analysts expectations. Setting a lower benchmark can lead to investors feeling more comfortable taking moderate risks which can be beneficial towards capital allocation and investment decisions.

Figure 8: Earnings scorecard 3Q23 across sectors

Fixed Income Macro

Interest rates are in a further elevated range as 10-year and 30-year US Treasury yields increased 29-33 bp month to date. Remarks from Fed Chair Powell interpreted the recent increase in longer-term yields as mostly due to term premium rather than to changed expectations for the path of short-term interest rates. As such it represents a pure tightening of financial conditions not motivated by an improved economic outlook. Because of this “at the margin” the Fed may need to do less to tighten financial conditions. On whether the Fed is done with the tightening cycle, he commented that “Additional evidence of persistently above-trend growth, or that tightness in the labour market is no longer easing, could put further progress on inflation at risk and could warrant further tightening of monetary policy.” It is expected that the Fed funds rate will be unchanged at the November meeting, while keeping the option alive for hiking at subsequent meetings.

Rising rates were a major drag for fixed income 3Q23 total returns and the environment is likely to remain challenging with outflows being felt particularly in emerging markets. EM hard currency bond fund outflows deepened from $5.8 billion in September to $6.3 billion month to date, taking outflows to $30.5 billion year to date. The Bloomberg Asia USD Credit spread widened 6 bp over the past two weeks which gives rise to the question whether a larger risk premium is required. In a higher-for-longer interest rate environment, outperformance is more likely for EM countries that maintain a stable macro backdrop and are less reliant on international funding markets, and for corporates that implement tender/buyback/calls, supported by bank loans or local bond issuance, underlining their ability to refinance amidst more challenging external markets. That said, uncertainty over future resilience is a risk of “higher for longer” rates. Material repricing of such risk may push spreads 50-100 bp wider.

In China, industrial production posted a fourth consecutive monthly increase and a rebound in export sector activity suggests that a significant external impulse is underway. The notable surprise in September was the pickup in retail sales, which added to a large August gain. Easing of financial conditions looks to be gaining more traction as total social financing (TSF) increased by a stronger-than-expected RMB 4.1 trillion in September. The government is raising the 2023 budget deficit to 3.8% of GDP from the 3% limit set in March including RMB 1 trillion (equivalent to 0.8% of GDP) of additional sovereign debt issuance, which will be allocated to infrastructure spending. From the credit market perspective that positive macro data may lead to discontinuation of policy support, the decision to lift the 2023 budget deficit comes as a positive development. Should the Biden-Xi meeting occur at the APEC CEO Summit over 14th-16th November, it can also be incrementally supportive for China credit.

Fixed Income Strategies

While recent remarks from Fed policymakers suggested higher long-term yields may reduce the need for additional hikes, they have made no such suggestion for the ongoing quantitative tightening process. QT will be contributing to higher yields for longer since the Fed is continuing to reduce its bond portfolio at a $720 billion annual pace amid a supply increase of longer-dated Treasury debt that the market will have to absorb to fund the US fiscal deficit. The Treasury projects that further increases in sizes will likely be necessary in future quarters. Marginal demand from large Treasury buyers such as Japanese investors will be less as they are rotating to JGBs. In the meantime, 3Q inflation prints coming in a bit softer than expected should be supportive for the short end of the curve. On balance, this favours lower yields over the near term in the 2- to 5-year sector than longer tenors, as the growing supply/demand imbalance points to higher term premium over the medium term.

US Budget Deficits Force Treasury To Issue More Debt

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.

Within the Asia HY sector, the China property HY default rate for 2023 YTD continues rising on the back of Country Garden’s default. Although ~75% of China property HY bonds comprise issuers that have already defaulted or conducted distressed exchanges, the broader impact on Asia HY is likely limited. First, the market value of remaining non-defaulted China property HY issuers is at distressed valuations, indicating that pricing already reflects significant stress within the segment. Second, the China property HY segment constitutes just ~5% of Asia HY market value. Going forward, the impact from China property HY to the overall Asia credit market is likely to be marginal. Asia ex-property HY valuations have improved – front-end India HY yields are currently at 8-9% range while Macau gaming operators offer similar yields. Reflecting the backdrop of risks, we are inclined to position in BB-rated issuers from these segments that are likely to be more stable, and in issues with short to medium duration.

China nationwide property sales showed sequential improvement with September sales rebounding 42% month-on-month. However, the year-on-year number dropped 14% with average selling price falling 4% month-on-month and 4% year-on-year. On the back of the home purchase and resales restrictions easing and reductions in downpayment ratios and mortgage rate so far, the easing impact appears falling behind expectations. New home sales remain weak with median primary Gross Floor Area sold falling 9% month-on-month and 36% year-on-year in October so far, following moribund Golden Week sales. Secondary market property prices fell 0.5% month-on-month. As recovery in the physical market remains challenging, we are inclined to maintain positions in SOE investment grade developers vs underweight HY developers.

China Home Price Declines Deepen Despite Stimulus Measures

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.

Equities Strategies

As previously reiterated, we recommend to gradually accumulate on any material market dips at more reasonable valuations in selected technology counters as well as in defensive and laggard sectors such as consumer staples and healthcare in the US, which offers more attractive risk/reward should the US economy enters into a soft landing in 2024 and in view of the strong YTD run-up in the US technology sector in general. In addition, the energy and defensive sectors could also serve as attractive hedging options if the conflict in the Middle East escalates.

For HK/China, we are and still remain cautious of the inadequacies of the policies and smaller scale stimulus implemented thus far to revive the economy. Nevertheless, we note that the real estate sector is showing initial signs of stabilization as the conscientious efforts of the Chinese government lift hopes that they stand ready to provide the necessary relief/support should the economy continue to deteriorate. We believe the Chinese government will likely continue to monitor the outcomes of these implemented measures for some time before any major step-up in stimulus, if any, is considered. Hence, we are of the opinion that any further significant stimulus, if materialize, will likely come later rather than sooner. Against these backdrop, we recommend investors to consider gradually adding some selected Equities exposure in HK/China in a staggered approach on significant market pullbacks while patiently awaiting 1) signs of recovery in the Chinese economy as a result of the current slew of smaller scale stimulus implemented or 2) further major stimulus, in particular those targeted at the real estate sector, that could revive slowing growth and market sentiment. Furthermore, we recommend a significant portion of these selected HK/China Equities exposure to be gained through Index ETFs rather than individual securities in order to mitigate market and P&L volatility and in the worst case, if further major stimulus fails to materialize.

Our preferred sectors are Technology, EV-related and Travel-related industries. We are also inclined towards infrastructure-related names in view of a potential accommodative policy stance. These sectors are trading at attractive valuations, be it from a longer-term fundamental perspective or that of a short-term swing trade. We also continue to be advocates of defensive sectors such as Telecoms and Utilities that provide reasonable dividend yields with decent valuation upside. While we continue to monitor key data points, in particular those that could lift the real economy, market sentiment and hence a rebound in Equities, we reiterate that portfolios should stay nimble and diversified. Overall Equities exposure should remain moderate to low as year-end looms with increasing geo-political tensions and as most of the concerns that plagued global Equities throughout the year still linger.

This document contains material based on publicly-available information. Although reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and objectivity of the information contained in this document, Raffles Family Office Pte. Ltd. (“RFOPL”) and Raffles Assets Management (HK) Co. Limited (“RAM”) make no representation or warranty as to, neither has it independently verified, the accuracy or completeness of such information (including any valuations mentioned).  RFOPL and RAM do not represent nor warrant that this document is sufficient, complete or appropriate for any particular purpose. Any opinions or predictions reflect the writer’s views as at the date of this document and may be subject to change without notice.
The information contained in this document, including any data, projections and underlying assumptions, are based on certain assumptions, management forecasts and analysis of known information and reflects prevailing conditions as of the date of publication, all of which are subject to change at any time without notice. Past performance figures are not indicative of future results.
Not an investment recommendation, offer or solicitation to any particular person
This document should not be regarded as an investment recommendation, offer or solicitation to any particular person to transact in any product mentioned. Before deciding to invest in any product, you should seek advice from your financial, legal, tax or other professional advisers on the suitability of the product for you, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs (to which this document has no regard). If you do not wish to seek such advice at your own decision, you should consider and assess carefully whether any product mentioned is suitable for you after having received and read in detail the specific product information and relevant risk disclosure statements.
An investment in any product mentioned in this document may carry different risks of varying degrees, including credit, market, liquidity, legal, cross-jurisdictional, foreign exchange and other risks (including the risks of electronic trading and trading in leveraged products). Investments involve risks. The prices of investment products may fluctuate and sometimes dramatically. The price of an investment product may move up or down, and may become valueless. It is as likely that losses will be incurred rather than profit made as a result of buying and selling investment products. Nothing in this publication constitutes personalized accounting, legal, regulatory, tax, financial or other advice that regards the personal circumstances of a particular recipient. You should seek your financial, legal, tax or other professional adviser to understand the risks involved and whether it is appropriate for you to assume such risks before investing in any product.
Any description of investment products is qualified in its entirety by the terms and conditions of the investment product and if applicable, the prospectus or constituting document of the investment product.
Product valuations in this document are only indicative and do not represent the terms on which new products may be entered into, or existing products may be liquidated or unwound, which could be less favourable than the valuations indicated herein. These valuations may vary significantly from those available from other sources as different parties may use different assumptions, risks and methods.
No liability
To the fullest extent permitted under applicable laws and regulations, RFOPL, RAM and its affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage howsoever arising as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance on any information, opinion, prediction or valuation contained herein.
RFOPL, RAM and its affiliates involved in the issuance of this document may have an interest in the products mentioned in this document including but not limited to, marketing, dealing, holding, performing financial or advisory services, or acting as a manager of persons mentioned in this document. RFOPL, RAM and its affiliates may have issued other reports, publications or documents expressing views which are different from those stated in this document and all views expressed in all reports, publications and documents are subject to change without notice.
Singapore & Hong Kong
This document and its contents are only intended for Accredited Investors (as defined in Section 4A of the Singapore Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289)) in Singapore and Professional Investors (as defined in the Hong Kong Securities and Futures (Professional Investor) Rules (Cap. 571D)) in Hong Kong. This document and its contents have not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore or the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Portfolio Managers:

William Chow – Deputy Group CEO

William Chow – Deputy Group CEO

Mr. William Chow brings over two decades of asset management experience and currently oversees Raffles Family Office’s (RFO’s) Advanced Wealth Solutions division while also serving on its Board of Management and Investment Committee.

He joined RFO from China Life Franklin Asset Management (CLFAM), where as Deputy CEO from 2018 to 2021 he oversaw $35 billion in client investments. William also chaired the firm’s Risk Management Committee and was a key member of its Board of Management, Investment Committee and Alternative Investment Committee. Prior to CLFAM, he spent 7 years at Value Partners Group, the first hedge fund to be listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where he was a Group Managing Director. He started his career at UBS as an equities trader and went on to take up portfolio management roles at BlackRock and State Street Global Advisors from 2000 to 2010.

William holds a Master’s degree in Science in Operational Research from the London School of Economics and Political Science, and a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering (Hons) in Civil Engineering from University College London in the UK.

Derek Loh, Head of Equities

Derek Loh – Head of Equities

Mr. Derek Loh is the Head of Equities at Raffles Family Office. Derek has numerous years of work experience from top asset management firms and Banks – 16 Years on the Buy-side across 3 Major Cities in Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo. Derek demonstrates in-depth industrial knowledge and analysis, covering mostly listed equities.

As an Ex-Portfolio Manager for ACA Capital Group, Derek managed a multi-billion-dollar global fund for a world-renowned sovereign wealth fund and reputable institutional investors. Previous notable investors serviced include Norges Bank (Norwegian Central Bank), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Mubadala. Derek holds an Executive MBA from Kellogg School of Management and HKUST. He is also a CPA.

Ek Pon Tay – Head of Fixed Income

Ek Pon Tay – Head of Fixed Income

Mr. Tay Ek Pon is responsible for fixed income investment management at Raffles Family Office. He has over 20 years of fixed income experience across Singapore and Japan.

Prior to joining Raffles Family Office, Ek Pon was a portfolio manager at BNP Paribas Asset Management since 2018, responsible for Asia fixed income mandates. From 2016 to 2018, Ek Pon led the team investing in Asian credit at Income Insurance. From 2011 to 2016, he worked at BlackRock, managing benchmarked and absolute return fixed income funds. Earlier in his career, he held several positions as a credit trader in banks for 9 years.

Ek Pon graduated from the University of Melbourne with a Bachelor of Commerce and Bachelor of Arts.

Sky Kwah – Director, Investment Advisory

Sky Kwah – Director, Investment Advisory

Mr. Sky Kwah has over a decade of work experience in the investment industry with his last stint at DBS Private Bank. He has achieved and receive multiple awards over the years being among the top investment advisors within the bank. He often deploys a top-down investment approach, well versed in multiple markets and offering bespoke advice in multiple assets and derivatives.

Prior to his role at Raffles Family Office, Sky worked at Phillip Capital as an Equities Team leader handling two teams offering advisory, spearheading portfolio reviews and developing trading/investment ideas.

He has been interviewed on Channel News Asia, 938Live radio, The Straits Times and LianheZaobao as a market commentator and was a regular speaker at investment forums and tertiary institutions.

Like this article?